Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Paranasal augmentation using Medpor implant and changes in lateral profile

±¸°­»ý¹°Çבּ¸ 2013³â 37±Ç 2È£ p.125 ~ 130
À¯Àç½Ä, ¿ÀÁö¼ö, ÀÓ°æ¼·, ½Å½Â¹Î, ±èö¸¸,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À¯Àç½Ä ( You Jae-Seek ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¿ÀÁö¼ö ( Oh Ji-Su ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÓ°æ¼· ( Lim Kyung-Seop ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
½Å½Â¹Î ( Shin Seung-Min ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±èö¸¸ ( Kim Cheol-Man ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to simultaneously evaluate soft tissue changes induced by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible as well as paranasal augmentation using a Medpor¢ç implant based on cephalometric radiography before and 6 months after surgery.

Materials and Methods: We analyzed the increase in soft tissue volume in 20 patients diagnosed with mandibular advancement and midfacial depression between Feburary 2005 and Feburary 2009. Paranasal augmentation was performed using a 4.5mm-thick Medpor¢ç implant, and lateral head radiographs were analyzed before and 6 months after surgery.

Results: The increase in soft tissue volume was 3.27¡¾1.16 mm, which was 72.67% of the actual thickness. After surgery, no particular complication was detected, and the results were acceptable to the patients and surgeons. Based on these results, the Medpor¢çimplant is a satisfactory artificial graft material for use in facial augmentation.

Conclusion: Paranasal augmentation using the Medpor¢ç implant can be considered a good surgical option that can maximize the aesthetics of a patient`s face.

Å°¿öµå

Medpor; Paranasal augmentation; Lateral profile

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI